MEMBER, STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, DISTRICT 8

⚠ 12
● Live Results·599,652 ballots cast·Updated 11/5/2026, 12:13:31 PM
50.0%300,108
50.0%299,544
Early vote vs Election Day

AUDREY G. YOUNG gained 3.5 percentage points on Election Day.

DANA VAN DE WALKER-3.5pp on E-day
Early 236,220 (78.7%)E-day 63,888 (21.3%)
AUDREY G. YOUNG+3.5pp on E-day
Early 228,522 (76.3%)E-day 71,022 (23.7%)
Race totals599,652 ballots
Early 464,742 (77.5%)E-day 134,910 (22.5%)
Menard: no dataHale: no dataArmstrong: no dataCalhoun: no dataClay: no dataOrange: no dataGonzales: no dataFannin: no dataKerr: no dataRefugio: no dataJim Hogg: no dataDimmit: no dataNolan: no dataBrazos: no dataJefferson: no dataBell: no dataBandera: no dataHidalgo: no dataSchleicher: no dataGrayson: no dataCrosby: no dataDelta: no dataZavala: no dataRockwall: no dataEastland: no dataDeWitt: no dataAngelina: no dataMcLennan: no dataLamar: no dataLeon: no dataStonewall: no dataMcMullen: no dataSutton: no dataFort Bend: 69,102 votes · DANA VAN DE WALKER 68.3% (47,202) · AUDREY G. YOUNG 31.7% (21,900) · 25,302 net for leaderParker: no dataKinney: no dataFayette: no dataBriscoe: no dataHarrison: no dataReagan: no dataColeman: no dataOchiltree: no dataCrane: no dataWashington: no dataLynn: no dataMills: no dataOldham: no dataSabine: no dataHopkins: no dataHouston: 7,327 votes · DANA VAN DE WALKER 24.4% (1,791) · AUDREY G. YOUNG 75.6% (5,536) · 3,745 net for leaderBexar: no dataUpton: no dataErath: no dataRandall: no dataRusk: no dataCoryell: no dataComal: no dataAransas: no dataJack: no dataHemphill: no dataShackelford: no dataSan Jacinto: 10,282 votes · DANA VAN DE WALKER 22.2% (2,279) · AUDREY G. YOUNG 77.8% (8,003) · 5,724 net for leaderKendall: no dataWharton: no dataFloyd: no dataKarnes: no dataKaufman: no dataDuval: no dataJohnson: no dataFranklin: no dataEdwards: no dataWaller: 23,303 votes · DANA VAN DE WALKER 45.8% (10,671) · AUDREY G. YOUNG 54.2% (12,632) · 1,961 net for leaderMaverick: no dataKleberg: no dataGaines: no dataMartin: no dataBowie: no dataAndrews: no dataPotter: no dataGarza: no dataCaldwell: no dataParmer: no dataTitus: no dataTerry: no dataFoard: no dataReal: no dataCarson: no dataKnox: no dataHays: no dataMedina: no dataMotley: no dataWichita: no dataMidland: no dataVictoria: no dataTyler: no dataFalls: no dataPresidio: no dataWillacy: no dataLubbock: no dataHenderson: no dataWalker: 21,052 votes · DANA VAN DE WALKER 36.7% (7,730) · AUDREY G. YOUNG 63.3% (13,322) · 5,592 net for leaderGalveston: 3,650 votes · DANA VAN DE WALKER 34.3% (1,251) · AUDREY G. YOUNG 65.7% (2,399) · 1,148 net for leaderHarris: 364,321 votes · DANA VAN DE WALKER 54.2% (197,443) · AUDREY G. YOUNG 45.8% (166,878) · 30,565 net for leaderDawson: no dataPecos: no dataNacogdoches: no dataGuadalupe: no dataTarrant: no dataJackson: no dataSwisher: no dataSterling: no dataWinkler: no dataFrio: no dataLipscomb: no dataCollingsworth: no dataColorado: no dataWise: no dataGlasscock: no dataShelby: no dataComanche: no dataBurnet: no dataGray: no dataHudspeth: no dataCass: no dataEllis: no dataCooke: no dataWilliamson: no dataCochran: no dataVan Zandt: no dataDonley: no dataJones: no dataGrimes: 11,547 votes · DANA VAN DE WALKER 24.7% (2,855) · AUDREY G. YOUNG 75.3% (8,692) · 5,837 net for leaderIrion: no dataNavarro: no dataBrooks: no dataDallam: no dataHunt: no dataMitchell: no dataWood: no dataChildress: no dataJeff Davis: no dataMontague: no dataBrown: no dataHaskell: no dataFisher: no dataConcho: no dataCoke: no dataPolk: 17,279 votes · DANA VAN DE WALKER 24.1% (4,156) · AUDREY G. YOUNG 75.9% (13,123) · 8,967 net for leaderCottle: no dataYoung: no dataLee: no dataCherokee: no dataHall: no dataHood: no dataArcher: no dataBaylor: no dataSan Augustine: no dataMadison: no dataMilam: no dataReeves: no dataNueces: no dataCamp: no dataFreestone: no dataRunnels: no dataTerrell: no dataDeaf Smith: no dataMarion: no dataLiberty: no dataJasper: no dataHansford: no dataChambers: no dataHardin: no dataCollin: no dataBrazoria: no dataThrockmorton: no dataBastrop: no dataScurry: no dataEctor: no dataLimestone: no dataDenton: no dataRed River: no dataMatagorda: no dataHardeman: no dataPalo Pinto: no dataLive Oak: no dataSherman: no dataUvalde: no dataBailey: no dataCulberson: no dataAtascosa: no dataWilson: no dataStarr: no dataDallas: no dataKimble: no dataMcCulloch: no dataCrockett: no dataHill: no dataKent: no dataEl Paso: no dataLoving: no dataDickens: no dataLa Salle: no dataLamb: no dataAustin: no dataHutchinson: no dataVal Verde: no dataSmith: no dataRobertson: no dataGillespie: no dataKing: no dataTom Green: no dataYoakum: no dataSomervell: no dataKenedy: no dataBorden: no dataSan Saba: no dataBurleson: no dataBee: no dataTrinity: 5,616 votes · DANA VAN DE WALKER 20.1% (1,130) · AUDREY G. YOUNG 79.9% (4,486) · 3,356 net for leaderCastro: no dataBrewster: no dataGregg: no dataWard: no dataWilbarger: no dataHamilton: no dataStephens: no dataLavaca: no dataBosque: no dataGoliad: no dataRoberts: no dataCallahan: no dataRains: no dataMorris: no dataLampasas: no dataUpshur: no dataWheeler: no dataSan Patricio: no dataMoore: no dataWebb: no dataBlanco: no dataNewton: no dataHockley: no dataPanola: no dataAnderson: no dataCameron: no dataMontgomery: 66,173 votes · DANA VAN DE WALKER 35.7% (23,600) · AUDREY G. YOUNG 64.3% (42,573) · 18,973 net for leaderLlano: no dataMason: no dataTaylor: no dataHartley: no dataJim Wells: no dataZapata: no dataTravis: no dataHoward: no dataEl PasoAmarilloLubbockOdessaSan AngeloDallasTylerAustinHoustonSan AntonioCorpus ChristiMcAllen
Hue = county leader · Saturation = √(net margin / 90th-pctile county margin), floored
Noted (12)
  • Underperform7.9
    POLK
    DANA VAN DE WALKER's margin -51.9pp vs statewide +0.1pp
  • Underperform6.5
    SAN JACINTO
    DANA VAN DE WALKER's margin -55.7pp vs statewide +0.1pp
  • Underperform6.3
    GRIMES
    DANA VAN DE WALKER's margin -50.5pp vs statewide +0.1pp
  • Landslide5.8
    FORT BEND
    DANA VAN DE WALKER won by +36.6pp vs statewide +0.1pp
  • Underperform5.8
    MONTGOMERY
    DANA VAN DE WALKER's margin -28.7pp vs statewide +0.1pp
  • Underperform5.2
    TRINITY
    DANA VAN DE WALKER's margin -59.8pp vs statewide +0.1pp
  • Underperform5.1
    HOUSTON
    DANA VAN DE WALKER's margin -51.1pp vs statewide +0.1pp
  • Underperform4.5
    WALKER
    DANA VAN DE WALKER's margin -26.6pp vs statewide +0.1pp
  • Swing outlier2.6
    HOUSTON
    DANA VAN DE WALKER shifted -6.9pp early→E-day vs -2.0pp statewide (4.3σ outlier)
  • Swing outlier2.5
    GRIMES
    DANA VAN DE WALKER shifted -5.9pp early→E-day vs -2.0pp statewide (3.4σ outlier)
  • Underperform2.2
    GALVESTON
    DANA VAN DE WALKER's margin -31.5pp vs statewide +0.1pp
  • Swing outlier1.7
    TRINITY
    DANA VAN DE WALKER shifted +1.8pp early→E-day vs -2.0pp statewide (3.4σ outlier)

County results — early vs Election Day

  • FORT BEND69,102 total
    WALKEREarly 38,985 · E-day 8,21747,202
    YOUNGEarly 17,638 · E-day 4,26221,900
  • GALVESTON3,650 total
    WALKEREarly 1,054 · E-day 1971,251
    YOUNGEarly 1,990 · E-day 4092,399
  • GRIMES11,547 total
    WALKEREarly 2,063 · E-day 7922,855
    YOUNGEarly 5,676 · E-day 3,0168,692
  • HARRIS364,321 total
    WALKEREarly 154,710 · E-day 42,733197,443
    YOUNGEarly 128,720 · E-day 38,158166,878
  • HOUSTON7,327 total
    WALKEREarly 1,307 · E-day 4841,791
    YOUNGEarly 3,580 · E-day 1,9565,536
  • MONTGOMERY66,173 total
    WALKEREarly 17,876 · E-day 5,72423,600
    YOUNGEarly 32,001 · E-day 10,57242,573
  • POLK17,279 total
    WALKEREarly 3,343 · E-day 8134,156
    YOUNGEarly 10,175 · E-day 2,94813,123
  • SAN JACINTO10,282 total
    WALKEREarly 1,585 · E-day 6942,279
    YOUNGEarly 5,552 · E-day 2,4518,003
  • TRINITY5,616 total
    WALKEREarly 828 · E-day 3021,130
    YOUNGEarly 3,380 · E-day 1,1064,486
  • WALKER21,052 total
    WALKEREarly 6,122 · E-day 1,6087,730
    YOUNGEarly 10,189 · E-day 3,13313,322
  • WALLER23,303 total
    WALKEREarly 8,347 · E-day 2,32410,671
    YOUNGEarly 9,621 · E-day 3,01112,632